Utah Radon Map, Levels & Testing Guide
Browse the 29 listed county pages surfaced for Utah. Open a listed county to compare its EPA zone, source caveats, testing meaning, and when mitigation pricing becomes worth checking.
High Risk
Moderate
Low Risk
Official Evidence in Utah
29 of 29 listed counties have official evidence
Open a county page to see the official source context: measurement fields, local burden, state percentile, and the next step for no reading, 2.0-3.9, or 4.0+ pCi/L.
100%
covered
Measured
29
State source
29
CDC source
0
Needs source detail
0
Measured Risk Leaders in Utah
County rankings from actual reported radon tests
These lists rank the visible Utah county pages by measured radon signals, not by the EPA zone label alone. Use them to spot where the state hub has a real data story before opening individual county pages.
29
measured counties
State-level evidence read
This hub has measured high-burden counties, so the first click should be evidence-led.
The state hub is now doing a decision job: it separates first-click counties, retest counties, and lower-signal counties from 29 visible county measurement rows. 21 counties cross the high measured-burden band, so those pages should answer testing and 4.0+ action questions most directly.
First-click counties
Open Beaver County first when you need the strongest local answer. It is tagged Test-now from 73.8% 4.0+ - 38.4 pCi/L primary - 183 tests. 24 visible measured counties are elevated or high enough to review before lower-signal counties.
Buyer/seller lane
Buyer/seller lane: start with the elevated or high counties, require a fresh lowest-level test, and turn any 4.0+ property result into quote or credit math. The hub has 29 state-source county rows to support that routing.
Retest lane
Retest lane: 2.0-3.9 pCi/L deserves more caution in the elevated/high county set than in lower-signal counties. The hub should send those users to county pages before product or cost paths.
Best county pages to open first
Start with these local evidence pages
Ranked by measured burden, 4.0+ share, test volume, and whether the EPA zone understates the measurement signal.
Beaver County
UT EPHT
73.8% 4.0+ - 38.4 pCi/L primary - 183 tests
Beaver County is a first-click page: 73.8% of reported tests at or above 4.0 and 38.4 pCi/L primary result. Route no-reading users to a test now and 4.0+ users to quote or credit planning.
Box Elder County
UT EPHT
56.8% 4.0+ - 12.0 pCi/L primary - 886 tests
Box Elder County is a first-click page: 56.8% of reported tests at or above 4.0 and 12.0 pCi/L primary result. Route no-reading users to a test now and 4.0+ users to quote or credit planning.
Sevier County
UT EPHT
57.8% 4.0+ - 12.1 pCi/L primary - 225 tests
Sevier County is a first-click page: 57.8% of reported tests at or above 4.0 and 12.1 pCi/L primary result. Route no-reading users to a test now and 4.0+ users to quote or credit planning.
Wasatch County
UT EPHT
62.0% 4.0+ - 10.2 pCi/L primary - 1,306 tests
Wasatch County is a first-click page: 62.0% of reported tests at or above 4.0 and 10.2 pCi/L primary result. Route no-reading users to a test now and 4.0+ users to quote or credit planning.
Highest 4.0+ share
Primary result 38.4 pCi/L - high-end 321.9 pCi/L
UT EPHT
Primary result 10.2 pCi/L - high-end 123.0 pCi/L
UT EPHT
Primary result 12.1 pCi/L - high-end 108.2 pCi/L
UT EPHT
Primary result 12.0 pCi/L - high-end 470.8 pCi/L
UT EPHT
Primary result 7.3 pCi/L - high-end 61.3 pCi/L
UT EPHT
Highest high-end reading
4.0+ share 43.1% - primary result 5.8 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 56.8% - primary result 12.0 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 38.0% - primary result 5.5 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 73.8% - primary result 38.4 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 31.2% - primary result 4.6 pCi/L
UT EPHT
Most reported tests
4.0+ share 37.0% - primary result 4.6 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 43.1% - primary result 5.8 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 31.2% - primary result 4.6 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 53.8% - primary result 7.4 pCi/L
UT EPHT
4.0+ share 34.5% - primary result 4.9 pCi/L
UT EPHT
Measured pattern
Among 29 visible counties with measurement tables, 21 land in the high measured-burden band and 24 land in high or elevated measured-burden bands. That lets this hub rank counties by observed test distribution instead of repeating the EPA map.
Map vs measurements
19 elevated measured counties are not EPA Zone 1. Those are the pages where the actual test distribution matters more than a map-only answer.
Source strategy
All measured rows shown here use state-specific official sources, so this hub can make source-backed county comparisons without leaning on a national fallback.
Already Tested
View Utah Cost Estimates
If you already have a radon result, skip the directory and move straight to local price guidance.
Understand the Number
2.0 vs 4.0 vs 8.0 pCi/L
Use the parent levels guide if you need the plain-English meaning of a radon result before browsing counties.
Need a Number First
Read the Testing Guide
Use the fastest valid radon test setup before you compare quotes or ask whether mitigation is worth it.
Browse Counties
Jump to the Directory
Open your county to see its EPA zone, testing meaning, and the point where mitigation becomes worth pricing.
Official State Resource
Utah radon program and rules
Use the state program link to verify local radon guidance, disclosure language, and contractor credential expectations before you act on an estimate.
Disclosure rule tracked
Utah requires sellers to disclose known defects through the Seller's Property Condition Disclosure.
Credential note
Utah does not require specific radon licensing.
Already tested? Get your itemized mitigation cost estimate.
View Utah Mitigation Cost Estimates ->