R
RadonVerdict
EPA Zone 2 - Moderate Risk

Radon Levels & Zone Map in Carter County, TN

Direct Answer for basement and lowest-level tests: Carter County is stronger than the EPA zone label suggests. Official county data shows 4.8 pCi/L and 33.3% at or above 4.0. Do the home test, and treat a confirmed 4.0+ result as mitigation-planning territory.

Quick Read

Treat this as a test-now county

The official source signal is strong enough that a first test is the minimum; a confirmed 4.0+ result should move into cost or credit planning.

County signal

Official measured data puts this county in a high-priority testing lane.

What the number changes

2.0-3.9 pCi/L usually means retest or track. 4.0+ is where EPA action and quote planning start to matter.

Fastest next move

No reading: test first. Borderline results often need retest or long-term tracking.

Measured Radon Data

Carter County evidence before the next step

Carter County, TN has more than the EPA map: Tennessee Environmental Public Health Tracking exposes 202 reported tests, 4.8 pCi/L county average, 2.5 pCi/L median, 33.3% of reported tests at or above 4.0 pCi/L, and 45.7 pCi/L high-end signal for through 2020.

Source window

through 2020

County evidence type

High measured burden

County context only; your home test controls the decision.

Primary result

4.8 pCi/L

81st percentile in-state

4.0+ signal

33.3%

72nd percentile in-state

High-end signal

45.7 pCi/L

85th percentile in-state

Official evidence dossier

Source record for Carter County, TN

Tennessee values combine the state county-average layer with a RadonVerdict ZIP-to-county rollup for the 4.0+ share, so they are useful as a local testing-burden signal but still cannot predict a specific home.

Open source dataset

Primary public source

Official county measurements

Measurement window

through 2020

Retrieved / checked

2026-05-05

County FIPS

47019

Primary field

4.8 pCi/L

Median field

2.5 pCi/L

4.0+ field

33.3%

Sample / volume

202 reported tests

Metric shape

This is the most useful setup: county average, 4.0+ share, high-end readings, and 202 reported tests/properties can be read together instead of relying on one number.

Source limitation

Tennessee Health Data says county and ZIP values come from radon test kit and mitigation company data; results before about 2015 may not be included, and county or ZIP averages cannot predict an individual home's radon level. RadonVerdict uses the official county average layer and rolls the official ZIP 4.0+ layer up to primary counties.

Property-level limit

Not a property-level diagnosis. The county record explains local evidence; your home's own test result controls the next decision.

County-specific interpretation

Carter County crosses the action threshold in the official county data.

Carter County is a test-now case because 4.8 pCi/L average, 2.5 pCi/L median, and 33.3% of reported tests at or above 4.0. In-state rank: 81st percentile for average, and 72nd percentile for 4.0+ share. No reading means get the first number; a 4.0+ home result should move straight to mitigation quotes or seller-credit math.

Real-estate use

Buyer or seller use: ask for a fresh lowest-level test before inspection deadlines, tie any 4.0+ result to a contractor quote, and do not negotiate from the county signal alone.

Carter County should be treated as a county where a first test is urgent and a 4.0+ result should move directly into mitigation pricing or seller-credit math.

Use This Evidence

High-risk intent answer

Is radon bad in Carter County?

Carter County should be treated as a high-priority testing market because 33.3% of reported tests at or above 4.0 pCi/L, 4.8 pCi/L primary measured result, and 45.7 pCi/L high-end signal in Tennessee Environmental Public Health Tracking data. A missing home reading means test now; a 4.0+ result means mitigation pricing or seller-credit math should start.

Home result translator

Enter the result. Pick the deal side. Get the route.

Official measured data puts this county in a high-priority testing lane.

County signal

4.8 pCi/L

At or above 4.0

33.3%

Decision side

Foundation clue

No reading yet? Test first. 2.0-3.9 usually means confirm the result. 4.0+ means budget local mitigation or seller-credit math before the conversation starts.

Fastest Path

Pick the situation that matches you

You should not need to read the whole guide before clicking one of these. Start with the lane that matches your current stage, then come back for the deeper reference only if you still need it.

Jump into a prefilled Carter County action plan based on the result you already have, instead of starting from a generic cost page.

Already tested once and need the cleanest follow-up path?

Review retesting steps

County Evidence Snapshot

Carter County testing context

County reference page

Carter County should be treated as a testing-priority county because the official source signal is stronger than the EPA zone label suggests. Official county data shows 4.8 pCi/L and 33.3% at or above 4.0. Use the EPA map as context, but let the home test decide mitigation or credit planning.

EPA map signal

Zone 2

County-level predicted indoor screening range, not a home-level test result.

Housing base

27,881

78th percentile among 95 TN counties with data.

Older housing share

47.0%

14th percentile in-state; older homes often need clearer test placement decisions.

Median home value

$145,000

Used as context for whether mitigation is a small maintenance item or a negotiation issue.

Measured Radon Data

Tennessee Environmental Public Health Tracking Radon Data

through 2020

Average result

4.8 pCi/L

At or above 4.0

33.3%

Maximum reported

45.7 pCi/L

Reported tests

202

Median result: 2.5 pCi/L.

Tennessee Health Data says county and ZIP values come from radon test kit and mitigation company data; results before about 2015 may not be included, and county or ZIP averages cannot predict an individual home's radon level. RadonVerdict uses the official county average layer and rolls the official ZIP 4.0+ layer up to primary counties.

County evidence interpretation

High measured burden

Source-backed context Not a home-specific result

Primary result rank

81st percentile

4.8 pCi/L

4.0+ rank

72nd percentile

33.3% at or above 4.0

High-end rank

85th percentile

45.7 pCi/L

Test volume rank

86th percentile

202 reported tests

How to use this county data

Data source

Official county measurements

Tennessee values combine the state county-average layer with a RadonVerdict ZIP-to-county rollup for the 4.0+ share, so they are useful as a local testing-burden signal but still cannot predict a specific home.

What the numbers show

Fuller county picture

This is the most useful setup: county average, 4.0+ share, high-end readings, and 202 reported tests/properties can be read together instead of relying on one number.

Nearby comparison

Nearby comparison: Closest counties by share of tests at or above 4.0 pCi/L: Blount County (33.1%) is just lower, and Hickman County (33.3%) is just higher.

How this helps

Use this to decide how urgently to test, retest, or plan mitigation after a 4.0+ result.

What the data says

Carter County, TN is measurement-backed for through 2020. The measured average is 4.8 pCi/L, and 33.3% of reported results are at or above 4.0 pCi/L. The high-end signal reaches 45.7 pCi/L.

Carter County, TN sits at the 81st percentile for measured average, 72nd percentile for 4.0+ share, 85th percentile for high-end readings, and 86th percentile for test volume among 95 measured counties in the state. Closest counties by county average: Blount County (4.8 pCi/L) is just lower, and Warren County (4.8 pCi/L) is just higher.

What to do with it

Carter County should be treated as a county where a first test is urgent and a 4.0+ result should move directly into mitigation pricing or seller-credit math.

Retest trigger: a 2.0-3.9 pCi/L home result should be confirmed here because 4.8 pCi/L average, 2.5 pCi/L median, and 33.3% of reported tests at or above 4.0 keeps the county from being a dismiss-it signal.

Source-backed context from Tennessee Environmental Public Health Tracking based on about 202 reported tests/properties plus comparable county-level measurement fields.

No reading yet

No reading yet: run a short-term test now, then confirm or price mitigation quickly if the result is elevated.

2.0-3.9 result

2.0-3.9 pCi/L: retest or track longer-term rather than dismissing the result, because the county distribution has meaningful elevated readings.

4.0+ result

4.0+ pCi/L: use the result for mitigation quotes, repair scope, or seller-credit negotiation; the county signal is no longer the deciding input.

Source hierarchy: Tennessee Environmental Public Health Tracking is used for this county, with EPA zone and Census housing data kept as supporting context. Tennessee values combine the state county-average layer with a RadonVerdict ZIP-to-county rollup for the 4.0+ share, so they are useful as a local testing-burden signal but still cannot predict a specific home.

Direct Answer

Is radon bad in Carter County?

Carter County should be treated as a high-priority testing market because 33.3% of reported tests at or above 4.0 pCi/L, 4.8 pCi/L primary measured result, and 45.7 pCi/L high-end signal in Tennessee Environmental Public Health Tracking data. A missing home reading means test now; a 4.0+ result means mitigation pricing or seller-credit math should start.

Evidence Value
Area Carter County, TN
EPA Zone Zone 2
Primary Recommendation Perform direct radon testing in the lowest livable level

Your Radon Reading

Enter your home's measured level; the starting value is only a planning example until you have your own result.

3.0 pCi/L
0 2.7 WHO 4.0 EPA 10 20+

Elevated - Consider Action

Your reading is below the US EPA action level (4.0 pCi/L), but this range still warrants follow-up testing. The World Health Organization uses 2.7 pCi/L as a tighter reference point.

If this was just a one-time snapshot, confirm it with another test or with longer tracking. If this level persists, planning mitigation is reasonable, especially for homes with frequent basement use, children, or pending real-estate transactions. Scroll down to see your estimated cost.

pCi/L

Understanding Radon Levels: Complete Reference

<2.0

Below 2.0 pCi/L - Lower Concern, Keep Testing

Below both the EPA (4.0) and WHO (2.7) action reference levels. This usually means mitigation is not the next immediate step after a confirmed result. The average outdoor radon level is approximately 0.4 pCi/L, and there is no known risk-free indoor level. Periodic testing is still recommended because levels can change over time due to seasonal variations, changes in home ventilation, or foundation settling.

2.0
-4.0

2.0 - 4.0 pCi/L - Elevated, Consider Action

Exceeds the World Health Organization's reference level of 2.7 pCi/L but falls below the US EPA action threshold. The EPA states that homeowners should "consider fixing" homes in this range, especially if the home has a basement used as living space, if children are present, or in connection with a real estate transaction. Practical next step: run a confirmatory long-term test, then compare mitigation quotes if levels remain elevated.

4.0
-8.0

4.0 - 8.0 pCi/L - Action Recommended

Exceeds the EPA action level of 4.0 pCi/L. The EPA and Surgeon General strongly recommend mitigation within a few months. At this level, prioritize confirmatory testing and contractor planning. Standard sub-slab depressurization systems typically reduce indoor levels by 80-99%.

8.0+

Above 8.0 pCi/L - Urgent Action Required

At these levels, the EPA recommends expedited mitigation - ideally within weeks, not months. Occupants should minimize time in lower-level rooms until the system is installed. Use a certified mitigator and request priority scheduling to shorten high-exposure time. Many mitigators offer priority scheduling for homes above 8.0 pCi/L.

Why Radon is a Testing Priority in Carter County

The EPA map is only the starting layer for Carter County. Official county data shows 4.8 pCi/L and 33.3% at or above 4.0. That source-backed signal is why the practical move is testing or retesting before treating the county as low urgency.

This still is not a diagnosis for any single home. Foundation type, lowest-level use, pressure differences, and small geological changes can move one house above or below the county pattern.

If you do not have a reading yet, start with a short-term test in the lowest lived-in level. If the result is 2.0-3.9 pCi/L, confirm it; if it is 4.0+ pCi/L, move into mitigation pricing or seller-credit planning.

Radon & Health: What the Science Says

#2
Leading cause of
lung cancer
21K
US deaths per year
from radon
1 in 15
US homes above
4.0 pCi/L

Radon is a Class A carcinogen - the same classification as asbestos and tobacco smoke. The National Academy of Sciences estimates that radon causes approximately 21,000 lung cancer deaths annually in the United States, making it the leading environmental cause of cancer death.

Unlike smoking, radon exposure is involuntary and often invisible. There is no safe level of radon - risk increases linearly with exposure. The good news: radon mitigation systems are highly effective, typically reducing indoor levels by 80-99% within hours of activation.

Source: US Environmental Protection Agency, "A Citizen's Guide to Radon" (EPA 402/K-12/002). National Academy of Sciences, Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VI) Report, 1999.

Step 1: Test Your Home

Testing is the only way to know your home's radon level. Zone and county data tell you the regional signal, but your home could be significantly higher or lower than the countywide pattern. Start with a valid test setup before using any cost path.

Testing first
Open the home testing guide
Short-term, long-term, retest, and real-estate setup
Need the official path?

State radon programs and EPA provider guidance are the right reference before hiring or confirming local requirements.

Open the state radon program

Already Know Your Level?

If your test shows 4.0 pCi/L or higher, get an itemized cost estimate specific to Carter County - including regional labor rates and permit requirements.

Get Mitigation Cost Estimate ->

TN Radon Regulations

!
Seller Disclosure

Tennessee requires sellers to complete a Residential Property Condition Disclosure covering known defects and hazards.

-
Professional Licensing

Tennessee does not require specific radon licensing.

Official state radon program

How to Test for Radon in Carter County

1

Buy a Test Kit

Purchase a short-term charcoal test kit online or from a local hardware store. Cost: $15-$30. Place it in the lowest livable level of your home.

2

Wait 2-7 Days

Keep doors and windows closed (except normal entry/exit) during the test period. Avoid running whole-house fans. Mail the kit to the lab provided.

3

Read Your Results

If results are below 4.0 pCi/L, re-test every 2 years or use a monitor for ongoing tracking. If above 4.0, use our cost calculator to see mitigation options.

Related Radon Resources for Carter County

Official State Resource

Tennessee radon program and rules

Use the state program link to verify local radon guidance, disclosure language, and contractor credential expectations before you act on an estimate.

Open official TN resource

Disclosure rule tracked

Tennessee requires sellers to complete a Residential Property Condition Disclosure covering known defects and hazards.

Credential note

Tennessee does not require specific radon licensing.

Sources & Methodology

Radon zone classifications for Carter County are sourced from the EPA's Map of Radon Zones, which uses geological surveys, indoor radon measurements, and soil permeability data to assign each county a risk tier.

Disclaimer: Zone data represents county-level screening ranges and cannot predict the radon level in any specific home. Testing is the only reliable method to determine your home's radon concentration. This content is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Content review: Source-level retrieval dates

Editorial and Data Transparency

Author
RadonVerdict Data Team (Public Data and Cost Modeling)
Content Review
Source-level dates shown below
Data Retrieved At
2026-02-24